Closet Classicist wrote:James Mc wrote:The only thing i can see that was removed before the demolition was the metal sculpture which used to sit above the entrance to 'Trash'. It was sitting on the pavement. Why retain this and destroy the A Listed facade?
Well exactly! It was this combined with the Dem-master smashing away that totally pissed me off and forced my hand. Yeah the trash sign / sculpture. An object of real cultural significance. Way to go contractors! Should people involved in this type of demolition not at least be screened to check that they have the expertise to deal sensitively with these buildings rather than just adopt a gung ho lets get it over with as fast as possible manner? Obviously arrived through some kind of comprehensive redevelopment time warp from the 60's.
It would be laughable if it werent true! Another well considered deliverance from CC, under the guise of Nial Murphy this time, well done mate, I hope it encouraged a well-read member of staff in the City Chambers canteen to spit in the beans! I feel inspired!
The council may not be directly responsible for the recent loss of these buildings but thier ignorance, I believe, has been a key factor in thier destruction. Thats what happens when you have safe seats for 30 years: you get complacent as you know no-one will challenge you!
Crusty