Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
Josef wrote:Own?
Either way, I can scarcely imagine an organisation less likely to restrict public access than NVA.
It was perfectly accessible last weekend.
kirstymaclaren wrote:Josef wrote:Own?
Either way, I can scarcely imagine an organisation less likely to restrict public access than NVA.
It was perfectly accessible last weekend.
I bought the book "to have and to hold - future of a contested landscape" published by NVA and in it Angus Farquhar says "we've bought the site and buildings; our offer was accepted".
I'm not sure I really get their arty plans tbh!
Dexter St. Clair wrote:
As long as it involves an electrified fence and guard dogs to keep out clowns who add more damage to the site with every visit I'll be happy with any of their plans.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:Every photograph taken encourages another clown to take a photograph. Just like these clowns have followed others.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:Anyone who walks through that site is damaging it. Anybody who hasn't been should be asking themselves why they would want to go there. What makes your case so special that you need to go and add to all the photographs which have been taken so far.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:And thanks for looking at the site without noticing I was pushing punters to take a trip to the Lighthouse to see the exhibion and then answer the question above. Here's a wee for your collection.
Return to Hidden Glasgow Projects
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests