Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
scottwramsay wrote:Very nice PJ, well done!
I got a phone call today as well - I didn't win a prize but my photo's up, which makes me think that apart from the really good few who won, there can't have been many entrants and they needed to fill up the space...
17. The winners may be required to participate in publicity arising from this competition.
For a maximum of fifty quid? Aye, right! ::):
Josef wrote:Oops. Sorry if I put anyone off.
I'm just off to St Andrews Square to see who had the temerity to beat Potatojunkie and Poodiecat into second and third place, btw.
potatojunkie wrote:The third place shot should really have won, it's quite exceptional. Most of the runners-up were better than the winning photo, too.
scottwramsay wrote: I prefer the highest one to the one on the right, but I still think PJ's is better than either.
Josef wrote:scottwramsay wrote: I prefer the highest one to the one on the right, but I still think PJ's is better than either.
I have been asked to point out, by the slightly miffed person concerned, that it looks much better in actual size .
As do most of them, to be fair.
Josef wrote:I have been asked to point out, by the slightly miffed person concerned, that it looks much better in actual size .
JohnR wrote:Josef wrote:scottwramsay wrote: I prefer the highest one to the one on the right, but I still think PJ's is better than either.
I have been asked to point out, by the slightly miffed person concerned, that it looks much better in actual size .
As do most of them, to be fair.
That's what I say to my wife too ::):
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests