Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
BTJustice wrote:Why do they keep spending all this money on high teck advertising campains when they could be spending the cash making the driving test better and turning out better drivers to start with?
If they were to introduce some sort of probation period then re-tests for everybody at 10 year intervals the driving standards would start to improve and the deaths would go down.
Dave
BTJustice wrote:Why do they keep spending all this money on high teck advertising campains when they could be spending the cash making the driving test better and turning out better drivers to start with?
If they were to introduce some sort of probation period then re-tests for everybody at 10 year intervals the driving standards would start to improve and the deaths would go down.
Dave
Mori wrote:49% of all drivers and 52% of women drivers said that
young drivers (those under 21) should be refused insurance cover on sports and high
powered vehicles.
Dugald wrote:The first of course is who pays the £1.8million cost?
davadvice wrote:...small cars that can be easly modified to churn out 100-150 bhp without the need for a large engine...
Dugald wrote:Education for people other than children, should be funded in some other way than through school taxes.
Dugald wrote:If there are people who cannot afford any such driving lessons, then it's just too bad; they will then have to learn their driving skills from some other source.
The Association of British Insurers says that uninsured drivers are ten times more likely to have convictions for drink-driving and are six times more likely to be behind the wheel of an unroadworthy vehicle. It seems that, once outside the law in one area, many of these drivers are willing to flout all rules of the road.
Return to Glasgow Chat (Coffee Lounge)
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests