Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
Smartalex wrote:MotoMad wrote:He doesnt have the right to look at whats on your camera.
If you deny him does he have the right to lift you for refusing?
crusty_bint wrote: i.e. they're not a bawhair away from Dickensian!
futureTom wrote:Seems like a normal day; got camera, left house, weaved past local schoolkids, went to bus stop, checked timetable . . .
"Excuse me sir, can I ask what you are doing with the camera" came a polisman's voice from above my head. I looked up a bit surprised to see two of the buggers eyeing me up suspiciously. "Err, taking photographs, why" says I.
"Taking photographs of what, sir"
"Anything that comes to mind"
"Can I see what's on the camera?"
So I show him the pictures and he compiments me on the loveliness of
my photographs . . . nice.
"I'm sure you can understand my suspicions, with a big camera like that near a school, sir"
"Eh, sure"
"That's good sir, I won't need to take any further action. You understand it's my duty to be vigilant"
Scary, but I suppose he was doing his duty, and there are a lot of scumbags out there. I felt a bit sullied by it. The ironic thing is, the lens I was using was a 12-24mm wide zoom, which is pretty rubbish for photographic sneakiness. Now if I had a 200-400mm zoom . . .
Dugald wrote:If I were a schoolteacher and saw someone I didn't know taking pictures in the area of the school, I'd inform the police, with the hope they'd send someone to investigate. Mind you I live in a city with six different Federal prisons in the region, in which many of the scumbag types mentioned by Futuretom, are incarcerated. Hmmm, I think I'd be suspicious even in Glasgow. Hey, aren't the police on our side?
elgee wrote:A somewhat sad reflection on the way life has become but as someone whose family has suffered due to certain photographs being "doctored" so now being very aware how seemingly innocent snaps of children can be used and abused I have to agree with you Dugald. I think the policeman was right to investigate.
My Kitten wrote:Haud the horses! The discussion isnt about chiild pornography or doctored pics but about being able to take photographs outside.
I was out yesterday and saw a nice 50's style primary school now if I took a photo of the building would the headmaster be right in condemming me as a prospective paedo and alerting the police? Are we all classed as prospective criminals? What percentage of the population actually take photos of children for dodgy useage?
My Kitten wrote:I was out yesterday and saw a nice 50's style primary school now if I took a photo of the building would the headmaster be right in condemming me as a prospective paedo and alerting the police? Are we all classed as prospective criminals? What percentage of the population actually take photos of children for dodgy useage?
Return to Glasgow Chat (Coffee Lounge)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests