by Closet Classicist » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:26 pm
Yeah since Tramway was refurbished it's been a long stated aim of GCC to find a use for the unoccupied bays. Scottish Ballet seemed to fit that bill but despite having conducted a through search of nearly 200 locations for their potential new HQ and then selecting Tramway as the best one, Scottish Ballet have had a weirdly ambigious relationship to, if not downright contempt for, it.
The current proposed HQ is their second attempt to move to Tramway. The first ended in tears as they tried and failed to evict the contemporary artists from one of Europe's best exhibition spaces. They had no interest then in the unrefurbished part of the building and instead came up with the stunningly imaginative proposal to turn Tramway 2 into their scene workshops presumably on the grounds that someone else had done all the hard work to refurbish it and therefore it made life easy for them.
This time around Scottish Ballet had no option but to go for the unoccupied bays and surprise surprise suddenly the accomodation was not fit for their purposes. Bizarre really when you consider just how robust Tramway's simple and elegant industrial architecture has been for so many other cultural purposes. I didn't hear Andy Goldsworthy, or Peter Brook, or DV8 complaining. Or Scottish Ballet propsing to demolish the refurbished section when they were wanting to nab that. Instead they unequivocally and uncompromisingly stated that these parts of Tramway had to be demolished or else, gun held to head, they weren't coming to the southside. I'm sure this option couldn't have had anything to do with them being in a listed building with maintenance problems in the west end for years, or that they'd have to pay 17.5%VAT for the refurb whereas new build is zero rated. Utterly cynical. Really this national body seems to have forgotten whom its there to serve.