Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
minxy wrote:I've tried the panasonic , and to be honest, it's very srtange looking through and electronic viewfinder, rather than an optical one, what you see is an electronic version of the real thing, rather than just a mirror image of the real thing.
I much prefer a real optical veiwfinder...its real. The colours you see in an electronic view finder seem to have some kind of colour tint to them, I'd try an electronic one out , then an optical one out in the shop MacotheIsles, see what you think.
Lucky Poet wrote:I harbour thoughts of some ideal camera that doesn't exist: large sensor, permanently attached fixed focal length lens of about 30mm, optical viewfinder, possibly square format, metal body, not many controls or options. I wish it did exist, though it almost certainly never will; probably the closest I'll get is a digital rangefinder, but they cost an eye-watering amount...
Lucky Poet wrote:The DSLR isn't going to go away any time soon, though, says me tempting fate. It's based on 50 year old principles, as regards the mirror and so on, but if it works it works.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests