Dexter St. Clair wrote:Personally, I've little interest in Radio. It's a left-over from before I was born (which was a very long time ago) that goes on in the car mainly to keep abreast of traffic conditions. Yes; there is the odd gem, but Radio One seems to be mainly half-wits wittering on about their toilet habits, Radio Two is as bland as ever and sems still to broadcast programmes from 1952, Radio Three reminds me of the teacher in "Charlie Brown" as for 4, 5 (and if there's a six and seven) ..... So what? Talk Sport is just another way of saying 'talk bollocks' to my way of thinking...
Well there's a well researched documentary in the making. It really sets out the standards followed by the independent sector. One of your interns could have possibly ran out and got you some references for the above points. I take it someone else marks the assignments you hand out. Another intern per chance.
From the above evidence you are tuned to real radio, you like Scottie McCue and it's a taxi you drive. Your other car maybe a porsche or you have a sticker saying you do. That sticker of course placed on the boot below the hand painted in gold script "Darren, Jason, Traceee and Jemyma"
Dexter, I don't know who the hell you are, or rather who the hell you
imagine you are; and from the "evidence" of your own posts clearly your position in life is (apparently) largely illusory. But my identity is clearly stated; I don't hide behind a 'handle'. My background is also easily researched and verified. Why don't you look my business up at Companies House? Or call Stow college to verify my position? Or perhaps even the DVLA... TIB 4018; the registration number of my Porsche; we have at least one cop on the forum I believe who could verify who that car belongs to?
My other car's actually a Land Rover....
No, as it happens, I don't drive a taxi. Never have, never had to probably never will. But so what if I did? Clearly from the lofty ivory-clad "St Clair" tower you're getting a bit concerned about the foundations and (rather like a chimp in a tree) have resorted to desperately throwing whatever comes to hand at whoever happens to be passing.
Your contempt for people who work hard at making the everyday things happen speaks volumes about you and your own abilities and indeed your own morals. First I was a corduroy (with leather patches) jacketed relic in the engineering department of a (mere?) technical college. Now I'm a taxi driver with (in your view at least) poor taste in vehicle decoration and unfortunately named children....
Apparently few of us could reach the superior standards of the sainted St Clair....
So far we can rule out everyone who occupies the social strata between the Taxi Driver and the highly qualified graduate engineer...
Of course our black-cab-clad friend is at least doing something useful to society and no doubt goes home at night to his warm comfortable house a loving wife and children who bring him immense joy. He's no doubt looking forward to a joyful family Christmas. And a lucrative new year during which he will both provide for his family and provide the people he serves with a valuable, nay essential, service....
So what useful (in terms of contributing to society) thing have you done today?
As far as I'm aware we've never met. Yet TWICE now you've sought to make defamatory (in intent at least) statement about me
personally and my work. So, Dexter, what have YOU achieved in life that places you so far above the rest of us? How many jobs have you created? Who did you provide with food today? Who did you help reach an appointment? What street did you help keep clean? How much filing did you do? Who did you cure? Who did you bury? If I type "directed by dexter st clair" into yahoo what do I get?
I'm NOT making a documentary about radio. It doesn't interest me in the slightest. Nor does football, knitting, walrus hunting, or bell ringing. And that fact I'm disinterested in one subject over another says precisely nothing about either the quality of my work or that if the independent sector generally. Your comment is therefore completely vacuous as well as off-topic!
Oh! One final point.
I've ALREADY told you quite clearly that DO NOT teach "media studies". Is it that you simply prefer to twist what I say or that this fact is beyond the wit of the mighty St Clair? Dishonest or just plain lacking in intellect? Or perhaps so entrenched in ignorance that you don't appreciate the difference between media studies and media production?