Punctuation

Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza

Punctuation

Postby Apollo » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:45 am

Well. we were invited to :twisted:
Only one place that it goes and that is before the 60
'60s
Indicating you have missed out the 19.
Yes, but what if it is class sixties, as in the trains'??
That is the sense I was referring too, to the year.
...... even though it is not really vital, would class become the 19??
Ok, ok, I'll take a look, but that was just what I was told.........

My interpretation:
60s would appear as... well, 60s. This is because it is a numeric representation of sixties, which doesn't appear as 'sixties. The pedantic would use '60s to represent the drop of 19 from 1960s, so, you pays your money... but 60s is preferable as it saves a character.

Not familiar with the trains, but Class 60 would pluralise to Class 60s. Assuming its a techincal term, it wouldn't be expressed in words as Class sixty or sixties. The wheels on the the train would be the Class 60's wheels :)

You'll have to excuse me for not considering the http://www.soyouwanna.com/ site, but I think I'd be on fairly safe bet that most of us won't be consulting an American site for advice on English grammar :wink:
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

punk2ation

Postby Pgcc93 » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:56 am

Quite correct Apollo I can see this punctuation lark only getting worser as time goes on ::):

_____________

Kids these days! :wink:
_____________
User avatar
Pgcc93
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 8:12 pm
Location: Hotel Du Vin

Postby Apollo » Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:12 am

We could start one on spelling 2 ::):
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby kn0wledge » Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:43 am

I should like to applaud you for upholding the standards of punctuation that are sadly falling ever lower in today's society, most notably on the internet. Bad punctuation and spelling is lazy and discourteous to the reader, implying that you cannot be bothered to look it up before you hit 'send.'

Mis-spelling words that we learn in primary school (you're/your, there/they're/their, too/to et al) is fucking unholy and should be punishable by death.
Eat a ham for Jesus.
User avatar
kn0wledge
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Bonkle (seriously)

Postby JayKay » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:10 pm

If I had a pound for ever time I have had to correct the copy of political "experts" who write MSP's and MP's I would be a far richer man than I am right now.
*value of posts can go down as well as up.
User avatar
JayKay
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 4:29 pm

Postby Apollo » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:27 pm

Speedbird wrote:To strive, to seek, to find, but not to yeild

Oh dear :(

I'm too much af a coward, will somebody else please let Speedbird know about the (no doubt deliberate) error contained the current sig please?
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: Punctuation

Postby duncan » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:34 pm

Apollo wrote:... Assuming its a techincal term ...


it's a technical
User avatar
duncan
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Glasgow

Postby duncan » Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:36 pm

Apollo wrote:I'm too much af a coward, will somebody else please let Speedbird know about the (no doubt deliberate) error contained the current sig please?


you spelt of wrongly. also you're missing in from before 'the current' methinks.
User avatar
duncan
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 9:54 am
Location: Glasgow

Postby Speedbird » Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:50 pm

I do hate smartarses ;-)
I can always rely on this forum to make myself feel about 10 times worse than I did before
Speedbird
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 5:01 pm
Location: Down the back of the settee.

Re: Punctuation

Postby Apollo » Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:15 pm

duncan wrote:
Apollo wrote:... Assuming its a techincal term ...

it's a technical

Close, but no coconut as I was using its as a pronoun, so no apostrophe. Don't you just love exact sciences?

I spelt technical wrong too (techincal) but if we included bad typing like mine usually is like that post and others, this thread really would be never ending. But, we could start another :)

[humble] Is there a non-occurance of a capital Y at the start of your sentence? [/humble]
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: Punctuation

Postby thecatsmother » Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:07 am

Apollo wrote:
duncan wrote:
Apollo wrote:... Assuming its a techincal term ...

it's a technical

Close, but no coconut as I was using its as a pronoun, so no apostrophe. Don't you just love exact sciences?


Nice try, but wrong. You should only leave the apostrophe out of the possesive pronoun - so, for example "the dog chewed its bone". What you wrote was a contraction of "it is", so it's written "it's".
thecatsmother
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby Apollo » Fri Sep 17, 2004 12:54 am

:o The coconut winner, and with the reason :o

No arguments this end.

Image
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby thecatsmother » Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:07 am

Hollow victory, since I hate coconut :wink: except on Caramel Logs, oddly. I don't generally go about correcting people's spelling/grammar, by the way (except in a previous life when I was paid to do so), and I've just noticed there was a comma missing from my previous post, but you seemed to want to know. Well, that's my excuse. Nothing to do with me having Chickenpox and being VERY irritable... honest!
thecatsmother
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Glasgow

In favour of the apostrophe...

Postby Apollo » Fri Oct 01, 2004 1:43 am

So, you won't listen to me telling you what to do with your apostrophes?

Well then, LISTEN TO BOB, THE ANGRY FLOWER!

http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

:)
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Destroy the apostrophe

Postby Apollo » Fri Oct 01, 2004 1:47 am

On the other hand, we could just DESTROY THE APOSTROPHE and simplify everything:

http://www.angryflower.com/destro.html

:twisted:
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Next

Return to Random Distractions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests