tommy sherridan

Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby aland » Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:20 am

come on folks if any of you had shagged anvar khan or katrine trolle you would deny it, question is once Tommy is in the BarL who will be keeping gail warm at night ::): ::): ::):
aland
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby The Egg Man » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:01 am

pingu wrote:
Dexter St. Clair wrote:
pingu wrote:
hazy wrote:
The sooner politicans and ex politicians realise that they are not above the law the better. He knew himself he was guilty. He was warned by friends not to carry out his futile case yet at great expense to the public he acted in self interest. Get it up him.


never a truer word said



evidence please.


all the evidence was presented in court was it not?

hence the GUILTY verdict



It'd be unusual for all the evidence to be presented in court. Both sides will do their best to ensure the bits which don't suit their case don't make an appearance in public.
I hear the people sing.
The Egg Man
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2702
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:07 pm

maximum sentence

Postby north glasgow dave » Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:44 pm

what is the maximum sentance..
and........whats the chances he will be sent to barlinnie..
furthermore should he have been given bail in the first place..
north glasgow dave
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:24 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby pingu » Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:54 pm

The Egg Man wrote:
It'd be unusual for all the evidence to be presented in court. Both sides will do their best to ensure the bits which don't suit their case don't make an appearance in public.


not true

both side would have the same evidence so if it didnt suit one side then the other would make sure it was brought up.

if either side had evidence that wasnt shown to the other there would be claims of a mistrial as has happened in many cases before.
toot toot
User avatar
pingu
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:15 am

Re: maximum sentence

Postby The Egg Man » Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:04 pm

north glasgow dave wrote:what is the maximum sentance..
and........whats the chances he will be sent to barlinnie..
furthermore should he have been given bail in the first place..



It doesn't look as if there is a maximum tariff for perjury.

My guess would be Shotts rather than Barlinnie.

I think he gor bail on the grounds he's unlikely to abscond. His face is a bit too well known for him to evade capture.
I hear the people sing.
The Egg Man
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2702
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:07 pm

preferential treatment

Postby north glasgow dave » Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:09 am

he should have been sentenced at the end of his trial.
just like everybody else.
north glasgow dave
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:24 pm

Re: preferential treatment

Postby The Egg Man » Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:15 am

north glasgow dave wrote:he should have been sentenced at the end of his trial.
just like everybody else.


Deferring sentence for background reports is becoming the norm nowadays.

I note Gail Sheridan looks to be intending to stand for Holyrood come May.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home ... -1.1079839
I hear the people sing.
The Egg Man
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2702
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:07 pm

Re: preferential treatment

Postby scaryman2u » Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:04 pm

The Egg Man wrote:
north glasgow dave wrote:he should have been sentenced at the end of his trial.
just like everybody else.


Deferring sentence for background reports is becoming the norm nowadays.

I note Gail Sheridan looks to be intending to stand for Holyrood come May.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home ... -1.1079839


See ye in Cupids Gail dawl ::):
User avatar
scaryman2u
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: GLASGOW

solidarity

Postby north glasgow dave » Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:25 am

gail sheridan msp...
some people dae anythin for attention ::):
north glasgow dave
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:24 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby BrigitDoon » Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:18 am

Coulson denied phone hacking under oath, didn't he? Wouldn't want to be in his boots right now that Mulcaire's starting to drop people in it.
UXB
BrigitDoon
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 4232
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:03 pm

preferential treatment

Postby north glasgow dave » Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:25 pm

maybe the news of the world people will get preferential treatment as well..
north glasgow dave
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:24 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby banjo » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:33 pm

browned off

tommy was`a politician and had been many years,
trying to beat the opposition with his crocodile tears
telling all and sundry he was a one woman man
but that went oot the windae with a certain ms khan

tommy was a striker but scored a real own goal ,
when he brought on a substitute,a right little troll
the match report was read out loud and tommys toes they curled
as his display had made front page of the news of the world

now his own supporters turned on him and booed
but tommy shrugged his shoulders and went ahead and sued
its for the working class he said,that i take this socialist stand
well,that and the chance of two hundred grand

soon enough the game was up and tommy cried poor me
ive just been found guilty of committing perjury
but i knew it was coming and that he was going to jail
for i saw an ad on gumtree saying sunbed for sale.
:roll:
banjo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:26 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby Vinny the Mackem » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:23 am

User avatar
Vinny the Mackem
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: Glasgow

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby cell » Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:50 am

"Mr Anwar told the Daily Record newspaper: "The formal complaint regarding Gail's treatment by police may well lead to a civil action. "She was left traumatised and is upset.""

Over the fact that they took her rosary beads away or because she found out her husband was a serial adulterer?
cell
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 470
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:54 pm

Re: tommy sherridan

Postby Roxburgh » Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:03 pm

Nevertheless, the appearance of taped police interviews with the Sheridans in a BBC documentary is worthy of a complaint.
Roxburgh
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:54 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Random Distractions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests