Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
nuttytigger wrote:i was once rejected from a job because of the school i used to go to. i used to larkhall academy then moved to hamilton grammar in my second year but the employers just saw Larkhall and said no.
i know that they did that because my aunt worked for the same company and asked why i wasn't considered
onyirtodd wrote:
I'd have thought even people from Larkhall knew not to tell the whole truth on a CV
Dexter St. Clair wrote: People have been excluded from being interviewed because of a disability.
Roxburgh wrote:Dexter St. Clair wrote: People have been excluded from being interviewed because of a disability.
Fact is .... a disability is just that ... a disability. If it means you cannot do the job in question or can not do it as well as an able bodied person then the individual shouldn't get an interview. Giving them an interview in these circumstances is pure tokenism and a waste of everyones time.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:Have you read the thread Onny and Roxburgh? Have you read the sample policies? So why are you posting nonsense. Naebody gets an interview solely on the basis of their disability. They've got to meet the criteria for the post.
I surprised you got past the door marked pull. With your reading level you must have pushed for at least five minutes.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:Have you read the thread Onny and Roxburgh? Have you read the sample policies? So why are you posting nonsense. Naebody gets an interview solely on the basis of their disability. They've got to meet the criteria for the post.
I surprised you got past the door marked pull. With your reading level you must have pushed for at least five minutes.
Dexter St. Clair wrote: So far there is no obligation to grant an interview to all candidates with a disability.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:It's usually part of of a set of policies adopted voluntarily by an employer. The policies should be accompanied by interview techniques training and training in disability awareness.
Dexter St. Clair wrote: and possibly a cynicism by pass.
Dexter St. Clair wrote: If you do have any suggestions as to how we increase the number of "disabled" people in worthwhile employment and some ideas as to how we can retain workers who become disabled, just post them up.
More often than not it's 'how little do I have to do to avoid being sued?'
Dexter St. Clair wrote:More often than not it's 'how little do I have to do to avoid being sued?'
Employ some disabled people. Simple.
Socceroo wrote:It seems to be any thread with GCC or Council in the title...funnily enough.
onyirtodd wrote:
I thought the purpose of interviewing all suitably qualified applicants with a disability is so that when/ if an organisation is chastised for not having reached the target of 5% (?) of the workforce being registered disabled, they can point to the fact that they're interviewing all suitable candidates, even if few have been successful.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests