Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:03 pm
by Alex Glass
Depends on where you come from HH.
Shettleston is a fine place and I have enjoyed working there for the last 8 years and hope to be there for some time to come.
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:37 am
by Doorstop
HollowHorn wrote:Elmbank Crescent:
A great place to "sow some wild oats".
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:31 am
by onyirtodd
HollowHorn wrote:Elmbank Crescent:
So it's not on Berkeley Street then(?)
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Fri Nov 09, 2007 7:52 am
by Josef
When did they start calling themselves Quakers?
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:11 am
by onyirtodd
Josef wrote:When did they start calling themselves Quakers?
They still call themselves Friends but accept that others call them Quakers (or Quackers, as I've seen here recently)
The truth but not the whole truth
Posted:
Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:27 pm
by dimairt
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:03 am
by MungoDundas
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:48 pm
by dimairt
Does anyone have a red pen? While you're looking, can you tell me why my pics don't appear on screen? What am I doing wrong? Please speak slowly.
Le durachd,
Eddy
Re: Signs 2
Posted:
Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:53 pm
by Sunflower
Dunno if this'll work for you, but some pictures stopped appearing for me a while back (seemed to be random ones, I was blaming the HG upgrade for ages but it turned out pics on Flickr were invisible as well) - I finally hunted down a suggestion to right click on the non-picture and untick the option that says 'Block images from xxxxxxxxx'. (And no, I hadn't ever ticked the 'Block..............' option). Or it might have been right click on a picture. Whatever, I did it once and all the pictures miraculously reappeared. Hope it works for you.
(Mentally deployed the red pen, wincing.)
Seeing is believing
Posted:
Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:42 am
by dimairt
Thanks to Sunflower and to John who posted the pic for me. Now let's try another.....
Le durachd,
Eddy