Page 7 of 18

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2014 10:55 pm
by Fat Cat
panthro wrote:I work at the GRI and I have it on good authority that there will be at least three extra general medical wards opening here soon to account for the loss of beds and patient flows when the new Sufferin' fully opens. Of course, not all singing and dancing single rooms with 'mood' lighting and electro-opaque walls but cramped, dingy open-plan Nightingale wards. I was speaking to a charge nurse recently from the WIG who says that the new SGH receiving complex will be in excess of 120 beds. I ask my patients from the Western's catchment which would they go to as a ED attender and a sizeable number say the GRI as others have mentioned. It will be interesting to see if there plans come to fruition Of course, patient flows have never been a strong point of health boards. The soon-to-be new satellite radiotherapy centre at Monklands Hospital in Airdrie expects folk from Castlemilk will accept going to Monklands for their treatment!

Off topic, but when are we at the Royal getting a new hospital? Wasn't the byline "21st Century Health Care in 19th Century Buildings" over-used when planning the new Sufferin'? Techically the Royal is 20th Century - is that how the health board get away with it? We're all fed up hearing about how wonderful the SGH will be. Couldn't they build a new more condensed Royal on the old Cattle Market with direct access to Bellgrove Station? Some compulsory purchases (car auction place) and the car parks could be built on Melbourne/Sydney St area?


Good post. GRI is the hospital of choice simply because of transport links with the west. The new SGH will, in 5 years, become part private. GRI old building at the moment is infested with fleas.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2014 8:12 am
by RapidAssistant
Fat Cat wrote:
panthro wrote:I work at the GRI and I have it on good authority that there will be at least three extra general medical wards opening here soon to account for the loss of beds and patient flows when the new Sufferin' fully opens. Of course, not all singing and dancing single rooms with 'mood' lighting and electro-opaque walls but cramped, dingy open-plan Nightingale wards. I was speaking to a charge nurse recently from the WIG who says that the new SGH receiving complex will be in excess of 120 beds. I ask my patients from the Western's catchment which would they go to as a ED attender and a sizeable number say the GRI as others have mentioned. It will be interesting to see if there plans come to fruition Of course, patient flows have never been a strong point of health boards. The soon-to-be new satellite radiotherapy centre at Monklands Hospital in Airdrie expects folk from Castlemilk will accept going to Monklands for their treatment!

Off topic, but when are we at the Royal getting a new hospital? Wasn't the byline "21st Century Health Care in 19th Century Buildings" over-used when planning the new Sufferin'? Techically the Royal is 20th Century - is that how the health board get away with it? We're all fed up hearing about how wonderful the SGH will be. Couldn't they build a new more condensed Royal on the old Cattle Market with direct access to Bellgrove Station? Some compulsory purchases (car auction place) and the car parks could be built on Melbourne/Sydney St area?


Good post. GRI is the hospital of choice simply because of transport links with the west. The new SGH will, in 5 years, become part private. GRI old building at the moment is infested with fleas.


To my eyes, the Old Building of GRI isn't fit for purpose anymore. Wasn't the plan in the 1970s to build more blocks on the Queen Elizabeth Building's podium (2 spaces on it are still empty, if you look at an aerial photo), so they could then progressively get rid of the old buildings?

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:02 pm
by Guacho
The Clyde heliport relocated to Linthouse this week. Adjacent to Thales, on the empty ground that used to be part of the old Stephens yard.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 6:09 pm
by RDR
Image of the helipad at the new Southern Build

Image

Ariel view showing Helipad and progress.

Image

Progress with the Teaching & Learning centre

Image

This one shows the Office Block, which is being built directly behind the Learning & Education Centre

Image

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:47 pm
by Guacho
I think I'll avoid the helipad. The admin building looks as though it will suit me better :oops:

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:33 am
by Alycidon
Great photographs, you really get the sense of scale with that one from above. The place is bloody huge!!

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:38 am
by RDR
Alycidon wrote:Great photographs, you really get the sense of scale with that one from above. The place is bloody huge!!


It needs to be huge, as the entire site will eventually have approx. 10,000 staff on it. To put that in perspective Motherwell has a population of 8,000. So its the size of a small town.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:22 pm
by HappyGlasgowGuy
I happen to work down at the Southern in the lab block, and can confirm that it stinks something rotten down there. If you go a full week without having to deal with the sewage works then it's heaven.

The parking issue is a total nightmare just now, and the proposed additional bus routes (especially for those north of the Clyde) just aren't happening. To put things into perspective, I live 4 miles from the hospital, right through the tunnel. We've all been told that we shouldn't be driving to work and instead get buses. Now, this 4 mile drive takes me around twenty minutes in busy traffic and yet to use buses, I'd need to get one into the bus station and then one back out, making the journey time (including the times waiting for buses) nearer the 1 hour 45 minute mark.

They've messed up big time with this one, there was no need to build such a massive hospital. If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2014 6:53 pm
by Fat Cat
HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:I happen to work down at the Southern in the lab block, and can confirm that it stinks something rotten down there. If you go a full week without having to deal with the sewage works then it's heaven.

The parking issue is a total nightmare just now, and the proposed additional bus routes (especially for those north of the Clyde) just aren't happening. To put things into perspective, I live 4 miles from the hospital, right through the tunnel. We've all been told that we shouldn't be driving to work and instead get buses. Now, this 4 mile drive takes me around twenty minutes in busy traffic and yet to use buses, I'd need to get one into the bus station and then one back out, making the journey time (including the times waiting for buses) nearer the 1 hour 45 minute mark.

They've messed up big time with this one, there was no need to build such a massive hospital. If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital.


I totally agree with this. A monumental cock up.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:54 pm
by Josef
RDR wrote:It needs to be huge, as the entire site will eventually have approx. 10,000 staff on it. To put that in perspective Motherwell has a population of 8,000. So its the size of a small town.


That's surely complete nonsense. Motherwell? 8,000 population? I've been to games at Fir Park where there were more than three times that many folk, and I doubt that -as per the evil twins - they are drawing support from areas without the faintest geographical connection.

HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:I happen to work down at the Southern in the lab block, and can confirm that it stinks something rotten down there. If you go a full week without having to deal with the sewage works then it's heaven.

The parking issue is a total nightmare just now, and the proposed additional bus routes (especially for those north of the Clyde) just aren't happening. To put things into perspective, I live 4 miles from the hospital, right through the tunnel. We've all been told that we shouldn't be driving to work and instead get buses. Now, this 4 mile drive takes me around twenty minutes in busy traffic and yet to use buses, I'd need to get one into the bus station and then one back out, making the journey time (including the times waiting for buses) nearer the 1 hour 45 minute mark.

They've messed up big time with this one, there was no need to build such a massive hospital. If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital.


1. It's a truism that you can never have enough parking spaces. I do agree that the transport to the SG- and to anywhere in the region of Govan generally - is appallingly convoluted. Nothing 'goes via'. Everything starts or terminates at Govan.

Nonetheless : 1 hour 45 minutes for a four mile journey? Bollocks. You can walk that far in an hour, let alone sit on your arse. PM me your postcode and I'll sort a route out for you.

2) "there was no need to build such a massive hospital". Yes, there was. DGHs don't work for anything other than minor complaints. Whilst I sympathise with folk who will have to travel miles to get to their nearest A&E/Maternity/etc, they'll be better off.

3) "If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital." I'd agree that that's the most effective option, Politically, it's not. See any number of "Save our local deathtrap!" campaigns.

Were you to say that a bit of joined-up thinking is needed re public transport to the SG, I'd thoroughly agree. Anymore (currently) inaccessible destination in central Glasgow it'd be hard to think of.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:35 am
by HollowHorn
HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:The parking issue is a total nightmare just now

The brand new multi storey car park is always nearly empty, the last half dozen times I've used it, I've always been able to park on the ground floor.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:18 am
by bigstevie
HollowHorn wrote:
HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:The parking issue is a total nightmare just now

The brand new multi storey car park is always nearly empty, the last half dozen times I've used it, I've always been able to park on the ground floor.

Hospital staff are not allowed to use the car park, they all use Hargate road. Now that's a nightmare in the morning....

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:45 am
by RDR
Josef wrote:
RDR wrote:It needs to be huge, as the entire site will eventually have approx. 10,000 staff on it. To put that in perspective Motherwell has a population of 8,000. So its the size of a small town.


That's surely complete nonsense. Motherwell? 8,000 population? I've been to games at Fir Park where there were more than three times that many folk, and I doubt that -as per the evil twins - they are drawing support from areas without the faintest geographical connection.

HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:I happen to work down at the Southern in the lab block, and can confirm that it stinks something rotten down there. If you go a full week without having to deal with the sewage works then it's heaven.

The parking issue is a total nightmare just now, and the proposed additional bus routes (especially for those north of the Clyde) just aren't happening. To put things into perspective, I live 4 miles from the hospital, right through the tunnel. We've all been told that we shouldn't be driving to work and instead get buses. Now, this 4 mile drive takes me around twenty minutes in busy traffic and yet to use buses, I'd need to get one into the bus station and then one back out, making the journey time (including the times waiting for buses) nearer the 1 hour 45 minute mark.

They've messed up big time with this one, there was no need to build such a massive hospital. If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital.


1. It's a truism that you can never have enough parking spaces. I do agree that the transport to the SG- and to anywhere in the region of Govan generally - is appallingly convoluted. Nothing 'goes via'. Everything starts or terminates at Govan.

Nonetheless : 1 hour 45 minutes for a four mile journey? Bollocks. You can walk that far in an hour, let alone sit on your arse. PM me your postcode and I'll sort a route out for you.

2) "there was no need to build such a massive hospital". Yes, there was. DGHs don't work for anything other than minor complaints. Whilst I sympathise with folk who will have to travel miles to get to their nearest A&E/Maternity/etc, they'll be better off.

3) "If only they had invested a lot of that money into targeting areas with the lowest life expectancy in Glasgow and aiding them rather than building a super hospital." I'd agree that that's the most effective option, Politically, it's not. See any number of "Save our local deathtrap!" campaigns.

Were you to say that a bit of joined-up thinking is needed re public transport to the SG, I'd thoroughly agree. Anymore (currently) inaccessible destination in central Glasgow it'd be hard to think of.


Josef,
far be it from me to argue with you but.....
At the last census, the population of Motherwell (as in the old Burgh boundaries) was as I stated.
the attendance at Firpark isn't a good judge of the population of Motherwell as the club draw support from all the surrounding towns (Bellshill/Wishaw/New Stevenson/Newmains/Carluke etc.), in fact Wishaw's population is more than Motherwell's.
I can also be sure, for reasons I can't go into, that there will be circa 10,000 staff allocated to the nSGH site and on any weekday, there will be around about 7,500 on site. Whatever way you look at it that's a lot of people.

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:48 am
by RDR
bigstevie wrote:
HollowHorn wrote:
HappyGlasgowGuy wrote:The parking issue is a total nightmare just now

The brand new multi storey car park is always nearly empty, the last half dozen times I've used it, I've always been able to park on the ground floor.

Hospital staff are not allowed to use the car park, they all use Hargate road. Now that's a nightmare in the morning....


That's not entirely true, there are areas in the multi storey set aside for staff, you just need a permit to use them....getting a permit is a whole other matter :evil:

Re: Southern General Redevlopment

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:12 pm
by Josef
RDR wrote:Josef,
far be it from me to argue with you but.....
At the last census, the population of Motherwell (as in the old Burgh boundaries) was as I stated.
the attendance at Firpark isn't a good judge of the population of Motherwell as the club draw support from all the surrounding towns (Bellshill/Wishaw/New Stevenson/Newmains/Carluke etc.), in fact Wishaw's population is more than Motherwell's.
I can also be sure, for reasons I can't go into, that there will be circa 10,000 staff allocated to the nSGH site and on any weekday, there will be around about 7,500 on site. Whatever way you look at it that's a lot of people.


I think I might be slightly handicapped by not knowing what the old Burgh boundaries are. But certainly, having looked at the Census figures from the General Register Office for Scotland for 1991, 2001 and 2011, they show Motherwell at a fairly consistent 30-31k and Wishaw similarly at 29-30k. That sounds far more like it to me.